Modify ↓

Opened at 2015-10-31T00:48:17Z

Closed at 2015-11-07T11:06:44Z

#1234 closed enhancement (invalid)

Multiple jabber accounts for one channel

Reported by: anonymous Owned by:
Priority: normal Milestone:
Component: BitlBee Version: 3.4
Keywords: Cc:
IRC client+version: Client-independent Operating System: Public server
OS version/distro:

Description

how to ?

Attachments (0)

Change History (10)

comment:1 in reply to:  description Changed at 2015-10-31T00:49:15Z by anonymous

Replying to anonymous:

how to ?

would be cool to combine not only jabber

comment:2 Changed at 2015-10-31T11:39:25Z by dx

Uhh, if you're going to ask questions like this, IRC is a more suitable medium.

irc.oftc.net #bitlbee

comment:3 in reply to:  2 Changed at 2015-10-31T15:21:36Z by anonymous

Replying to dx:

Uhh, if you're going to ask questions like this, IRC is a more suitable medium.

irc.oftc.net #bitlbee

im asking for a function, cause as i undestand there is only one protocol per channel?

comment:4 Changed at 2015-10-31T16:02:35Z by dx

Control channels can have several accounts, that's how they behave by default.

Chat channels can have only one chat and I don't see how it would make sense to merge more than one.

comment:5 in reply to:  4 Changed at 2015-11-01T04:12:26Z by anonymous

Replying to dx:

Control channels can have several accounts, that's how they behave by default.

Chat channels can have only one chat and I don't see how it would make sense to merge more than one.

thanks, so how do i setup a control channel with only 2 accounts from 5 account="account1,account2" ?

comment:6 Changed at 2015-11-01T07:38:28Z by dx

Read help set fill_by

You can't pick several accounts by name while excluding others, see #1025 for that, but you might be able to get the same effect by using negations, or filtering by protocol instead of account tag.

comment:7 in reply to:  6 Changed at 2015-11-01T19:15:39Z by anonymous

Replying to dx:

Read help set fill_by

You can't pick several accounts by name while excluding others, see #1025 for that, but you might be able to get the same effect by using negations, or filtering by protocol instead of account tag.

Thanks you ! Didnt know about it

Where can i read more clearly about negations and how to do this, (its group?) i dont yet undestood it. As for "filtering by protocol" i have 2 different protolocs, so i think i cant merge them to one control chan .

comment:8 Changed at 2015-11-01T20:14:41Z by dx

It's all in help set fill_by

<@root> With a ! prefix an inverted channel can be created, for example with this setting set to !group you can create a channel with all users not in that group.

comment:9 in reply to:  8 Changed at 2015-11-03T18:43:36Z by anonymous

Replying to dx:

It's all in help set fill_by

<@root> With a ! prefix an inverted channel can be created, for example with this setting set to !group you can create a channel with all users not in that group.

yeah i red twice, i surrender, ununderstable for me and no where ican find a examples,thanks btw

comment:10 Changed at 2015-11-07T11:06:44Z by dx

Resolution: → invalid
Status: new → closed

Not much to do here, closing!

Also please use irc the next time for questions like this.

Modify Ticket

Action
as closed The ticket will remain with no owner.
The resolution will be deleted.

Add Comment

E-mail address and name can be saved in the Preferences.

Attachments ↑ Description ↑
 
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.